Why we built Audmit
We started Audmit because we watched California's AI statutes multiply while the companies they affect had no clear way to figure out which ones applied. The statutes themselves are accessible — they're public law — but mapping them to a specific company's operations requires both legal interpretation and technical understanding of AI systems. That combination is expensive when you hire for it and confusing when you try to do it yourself.
We thought the answer was a system that does the mapping first: take in what a company actually does with AI, match it against the obligations, and produce a clear picture of what's in scope before anyone picks up a pen. Not a chatbot that paraphrases statute text, but a structured compliance engine that a company can walk through, and that an attorney can review and sign off on.
That's what Audmit does. We map which California AI obligations apply to a given company, we organize the evidence needed to close each one, we track the work through to completion, and we make sure every closure is reviewed by a licensed attorney before it ships. The system handles the structure; the attorney handles the judgment.
We built this for mid-market companies and growing startups — the organizations that take compliance seriously but don't have a ten-person legal team to throw at it. If you're a Fortune 500 with an in-house AI governance group, you probably have this covered. If you're everyone else in California deploying AI systems, we built Audmit for you.
Founders
Technical founder
Platform architecture & AI systems
Two decades of experience in enterprise AI and platform architecture, spanning system design, data infrastructure, and production ML deployments at scale. Author of published books on AI-first architecture and AI-first industrial automation.
At Audmit, leads the compliance engine, the self-assessment framework, the obligation-mapping system, and the platform that attorneys and compliance leads use to track and close obligations.
Legal founder
California attorney
Licensed California attorney with practice experience spanning privacy, technology regulation, and business compliance. [Additional practice-area language to be supplied and approved by counsel.]
At Audmit, leads the legal analysis framework, the obligation taxonomy, the dual-counsel model, and the of-counsel network. Ensures every compliance determination meets the standard an attorney would sign off on — because one does.
How we're structured
Audmit operates as two entities by design, not by accident. The technology company provides the compliance platform, the self-assessment tool, the obligation-tracking system, and the consulting services that organize a company's compliance work. Legal services — attorney review, legal sign-off, engagement letters — are provided by the affiliated law practice under a separate engagement between the practice and the client. This structure keeps the technology and consulting accessible while ensuring that legal work is performed by licensed attorneys under proper professional obligations.
For the full disclosure, see our Professional Services Disclosure.
What we stand for
Plain language
If you can't understand it, it can't help you comply.
Ruled-out verdicts
Knowing a law doesn't apply is just as valuable as knowing it does.
Attorney-reviewed closures
Every determination is reviewed by legal professionals before it ships.
Maintained compliance
Laws change. We track those changes so your assessments stay current.
See what we built
Run the free self-assessment or walk through the live demo to see how Audmit maps obligations.